KONSEP UMMAH WĀHIDAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN DAN RELEVANSINYA DENGAN KONTEKS KEKINIAN: Studi Komparatif Penafsiran Hamka dan Kementerian Agama RI

Ihsan Nurmansyah; Sherli Kurnia Oktaviana; Nur Annisa

doi:10.47454/alitqan.v8i2.818

Authors

Ihsan Nurmansyah IAIN Pontianak
Sherli Kurnia Oktaviana IAIN Pontianak
Nur Annisa IAIN Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47454/alitqan.v8i2.818

Abstract

Basically Muslims around the world are ummah wahidah. But in reality, some Muslims actually conflict with each other and are divided due to differences in opinions, views, by blaming each other and disbelief. Therefore, how do the concepts of the two interpretations written by Hamka and the Ministry of Religion RI respond to this problem, where the two interpretations discuss about society. The method used is the comparative method. The results of this study are 1) Hamka and the Ministry of Religion RI agree in interpreting ummah wahidah as one belief in monotheism and one who likes to do good. Both of them provide a way to realize ummah wahidah by returning to the book that contains the truth and mentioning the factors that become obstacles to the realization of ummah wahidah, namely envy. The difference is, in explaining the meaning, constraints and ways of realizing ummah wahidah, Hamka is more detailed, while the Ministry of Religion RI is simpler; 2) The ummah wahidah offered by Hamka and Ministry of Religion RI is still very relevant to the current context. From the two books of his commentary, he provides a solution so that Muslims adhere to the Al-Quran and as-Sunnah. Meanwhile, Hamka specifically provides a way for humans to return to their unity by finding common ground that refers to good values, even as a means to compete in goodness; 3) The implication is that Muslims must change their mindset and be mature to accept the differences that exist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Abdul Baqi, Muhammad Fuad. Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfāẓ al-Qur’anul Karīm. Kairo: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.

Amrullah, Haji Abdul Malik Karim. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Vol. 5. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional, 2007.

———. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Vol. 6. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional, 2007.

———. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Vol. 1. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional, 2007.

———. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Vol. 3. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional, 2007.

Hasan, Alfian Miftah, dan Muhamad Ali Mustofa Kamal. “Wawasan Al-Qur’an Tentang Nasionalisme: Tafsir Tematik Dengan Term Ummah Konteks Ke-Indonesia-an.” Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Hukum 5, no. 01 (2019): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v5i01.1181.

Huda, Nur, Nur Hamid, dan Muhammad Khoirul Misbah. “Konsep Wasathiyyah M. Quraish Shihab dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah (Analisis Hermeneutika Hans-Georg Gadamer).” International Journal Ihya’’Ulum al-Din 22, no. 2 (2020): 198–231. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.22.2.6768.

Ibnu ‘Asyur. Al-Tahrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Vol. 17. Tunis: Dār al-Tunīsiyah, 1984.

Jamil, Muhammad. “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Solidaritas Semut dan Nabi Sulaiman Dalam Surat Al-Naml pada Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam 2, no. 2 (2018): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.35316/edupedia.v2i2.334.

Japakiya, Ismail Lutfi. “Ummah Wahidah Dasar Kehidupan Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah.” Al-Nur 23, no. 2 (2017): 1–15.

Kementerian Agama, RI. Al-Qur’an dan Tafsirnya. Vol. 4. Jakarta: Widya Cahaya, 2008.

———. Al-Qur’an dan Tafsirnya. Vol. 6. Jakarta: Widya Cahaya, 2008.

———. Al-Qur’an dan Tafsirnya. Vol. 1. Jakarta: Widya Cahaya, 2008.

———. Al-Qur’an dan Tafsirnya. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Widya Cahaya, 2008.

Matondang, Ali Ya’kub. “Ummah Wahidah in al-Qur’an and Its Implication to Da’wah Activity.” Journal Of Humanities And Social Science 21, no. 7 (2016): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2106010106.

Muhammad. 25 Hidangan dari al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Khazanah al-Qur’an, 2017.

Muhyiddin. “Bahaya Mudah Mengafirkan Sesama Muslim Menurut Syekh Nawawi.” Republika Online, 4 Juli 2019. https://republika.co.id/share/pu3wv2320.

Mustaniruddin, Ahmad, Hery Afriyadi, dan Jamilah Abu Bakar. “Indikator Terciptanya Masyarakat Madani Perspektif Al-Qur’an.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 19, no. 2 (2020): 164–87. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v19i2.127.

Mustaqim, Abdul. Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir. Yogyakarta: Idea Press, 2015.

Nurdin, Ali, Sayed Mahdi, dan Arum Titisari. Quranic Society: Menelusuri Konsep Masyarakat Ideal dalam Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2006.

Nurmansyah, Ihsan. “Epistemologi Penafsiran Ummah Wahidah dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Komparatif antara Hamka dan Kementerian Agama RI.” Ibn Abbas: Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir 2, no. 1 (2019): 257–85. https://doi.org/10.9876/jia.v2i1.4855.

———. “Islam dan Media Sosial: Kajian Living Hadis dalam Film ‘Papi dan Kacung’ di Instagram.” Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya 4, no. 2 (2019): 201–16. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v4i2.591.

Sayyid Qutb. Tafsīr fī Ẓilāl al-Qur’ān. Vol. 1. Beirūt: Dār al-Shurūq, 1982.

Tsani, Ali Farkhan. “Khutbah Jumat: Ummatan Wahidah.” Kantor Berita MINA (blog), 18 Oktober 2018. https://minanews.net/khutbah-jumat-ummatan-wahidah/.

Zubaidillah, Muh Haris, dan M. Ahim Sulthan Nuruddaroini. “Ideal Society Prototype in the Quran.” Dalam International Student Conference of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought, 1:72–86. Yogyakarta, 2021. https://conference.uin-suka.ac.id/index.php/iscushith/article/view/473.

Zubir, Muhammad. “Social Community in the Qur’an (A Study of Muhammad Abduh’s Interpretation in Tafsir Al-Manar).” Islam Transformatif: Journal of Islamic Studies 6, no. 1 (2022): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v6i1.5506.