KRITIK ATAS KRITIK IGNAZ GOLDZIHER TENTANG QIRĀ’ĀT

Authors

  • Ecky Syahrullah STAI Al-Anwar Sarang Rembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47454/itqan.v3i2.674

Abstract

Goldziher went to great length to impose the Qur'an as scripture by critisizing the Qirā'āt aspect. He argued that the existence of Qirā'āt was an evidence of inconsistency of the Qur'an in its reading variants. Goldziher also revealed that Muslims previously tried to equate the Qirā'āt, but this was not realized because it was hampered by the lack of punctuation system at that time. This article describes and analyzes some of the scholars' criticisms which has criticized Goldziher's opinion. From the analysis, it is found that Goldziher's argument is not supported by strong evidence and data, and tends to ignore historical data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A’zamī, (al) M. Musṭafa. The History of The Quranic Text from Revelation to The Compilation: A Comparative Studi with The Old and New Testaments, terj. Anis Malik Thaha dkk. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2005.

Badawī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. al-Mausu’ah al-Mustashriqūn. Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm li al-Malāyīn, 1993.

Buchari, A. Manan Menyingkap Tabir Orientalisme. Jakarta: Amzah, 2006

Fathurrozi, Moh. “Eksistensi Qirā’āt Al-Qur`an Studi Kritis atas Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher”, Ṣuḥuf, Vol. 9, No. 1, Juni 2016.

Goldziher,Ignaz. Mażāhib at-Tafsīr al-Islāmī, terj. ‘Abdul Halīm an-Najjār. Kairo: Maktabah al-Khanji, 1955.

Hulaimi, Aris Hilmi. “Qira’at dalam Perspektif Ignaz Goldziher: (Studi Kritik Pemikiran Orientalis) ” Jurnal Studia Quranika: Jurnal Studi Qur’an, Vol. 14, No. 1, Maret 2016.

Ilyas,Yunahar. Kuliah Ulumul Quran. Yogyakarta: Itqan Publishing, ttt.

Ismā’īl Sya‘bān Muhammad. al-Qiraāt Ahkāmuha wa Mashdaruhā. Kairo: Dār al-Salām, 2008.

Muin, A. Orientalisme dan Studi tentang Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1978.

Muslīm ibn Hajjaj, Musnād al-Ṣoḥīh al-Mukhtaṣor/Ṣoḥīh Muslīm. Beirut: Dār Ihyā’al-Turoth al-A’rābī, tth.

Qādī, (al) Abd al-Fattā. al-Qirā’āt fi Naẓr al-Mustasyriqīn wa al-Mulḥidīn. Beirut: Dār al-Ilm li al-Malāyiīn, 1993.

Suyῡtī,Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Itqān fī Ulῡmil Qur’an, terj, Studi Al-Qur`an Komperhensif. Surakarta: Indiva Pustidaka.

Ṭabārī, (al) Abu Ja’far. Jami’ al-Bayān fi Ta’wil ay al-Qur`an. ttp: Muasasah al-Risalah: 1420/2000.

Teng, H. Muhammad Bahar Akkase. “Orientalis dan Orientalisme Dalam Prespektif Sejarah”, Jurnal Ilmu Budayai¸Vol.4, No. 1, Juni 2016.

Wahid, Abdul dan Zaini, Muhammad. Pengantar Ulumul Quran Dan Ulumul Hadist. Banda Aceh: Yayasan Pena, 2016.

Widayati,Romlah. Implikasi Qirā’āt Syādzdzah terhadap Istinbaṭ Hukum. Jakarta: Transpustidaka, 2015.

Yusuf, Khaeruddin. “Al-A’ẓamī Dan Fenomena Qirā’at Al-Qur`an: Antara Multiple Reading Dengan Variant Reading”,Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika. Vol.11, No. 1, Juni 2014

Zurqānī, (al) Muhammad Abdu al-Adẓīm. Manāhil al-‘Irfān fī ‘Ulum al-Qur`an. Mesir: al-Bāb al-Ḥalabī, tth.

Published

2017-08-19

How to Cite

Ecky Syahrullah. (2017). KRITIK ATAS KRITIK IGNAZ GOLDZIHER TENTANG QIRĀ’ĀT. AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 3(2), 118-138. https://doi.org/10.47454/itqan.v3i2.674